DLLR's Division of Labor and Industry

 

Chapter IX - Complaints and Referrals - MOSH Field Operations Manual - Maryland Occupational Safety and Health (MOSH)

 

B. Referrals.

1. General. As a rule, referrals will be handled in a manner similar to that of complaints.

2. Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, a referral is normally distinguished from a complaint by the source providing information on the alleged hazard. Notices of hazards or alleged violations originated by the sources listed below shall be considered as referrals, except as otherwise noted. All other notices of hazards shall be considered as complaints, including employee complaints transmitted to the agency by other government agencies.

3. Sources of Referrals. Referrals may originate from the following sources: industrial hygienist or compliance officer referrals; safety and health agency referrals; safety and health professional referrals; discrimination investigator referrals; other government agency referrals; media reports.

a. CO/IH Referrals.

(1) Types of CO/IH Referrals. There are two types of CO/IH referrals.

(a) Safety (Health to Safety or Safety to Safety).

(b) Health (Safety to Health or Health to Health).

NOTE: This includes referrals from Federal OSHA.

(2) Subject of CO/IH Referrals. Generally, CO/IH referrals shall be limited to potentially serious hazards observed during an inspection or visible from or in public areas, such as streets, highways or the public areas of business premises.

(3) Reinspections. When a serious citation is withdrawn prior to settlement or administrative hearing because of incomplete or erroneous inspection information or because of administrative error which cannot be corrected through an amendment to the citation, the Assistant Commissioner/Authorized Representative shall handle the reinspection of such cases as CO/IH referrals whenever there is reason to believe that the violative conditions continue to exist.

(4) Circumstances. There are circumstances when an CO/IH referral may be necessary or appropriate, such as the following:

(a) The CO/IH lacks the necessary expertise.

(b) The CO/IH observing the hazard is already assigned to an inspection of higher priority.

(c) The CO/IH observes specific evidence of imminent danger or serious hazards at a worksite not scheduled for an inspection.

(d) Equipment necessary for an inspection is not available at the time.

(e) Efficient utilization of Regional Office resources requires that a referral be made (e.g., the size of the workplace, the number of employees involved, the length of time likely to be required for an inspection, the extent of hazards observed, etc.).

(f) The observations occur outside the CO/IH's normal working hours (CO/IH on annual leave, sick leave, etc.)

NOTE: For inspection classification purposes, if an CO/IH lacks the expertise to handle all complaint items or to complete an imminent danger or accident investigation or for some other reason requires assistance from another CO/IH, within his own area of assignment such assistance shall be counted as part of the original complaint or imminent danger and not as a referral. Such assistance shall not be counted as a separate inspection unless another discipline is involved (e.g., safety to health or health to safety).

b. Safety and Health Agency Referrals. This category includes referrals by NIOSH, 7(c)(1) consultation programs, and discrimination investigators.

NOTE: For purposes of assigning an inspection priority, referrals from these sources will be considered as equivalent to CO/IH referrals, although not counted as such by IMIS.

c. Nonformal Discrimination Complaint Referrals. The Assistant Commissioner/Authorized Representative may decide to send nonformal discrimination complaints which also allege hazardous working conditions or violation of MOSH regulations, for investigation under the procedures for discrimination complaints, above.

(1) If originally received in the MOSH Operations Office and assigned to the Discrimination Unit for handling of the discrimination complaint as outlined in Chapter X, such a complaint will already have been recorded in the MOSH Operations Office as a nonformal complaint if it also includes a notice which meets the definition of "complaint".

(2) If the complaint was originally filed with the Assistant Commissioner/Authorized Representative, it shall be recorded by the MOSH Operations Office as a nonformal complaint.

(3) When a nonformal complaint is received from the Discrimination Investigator with a recommendation for inspection, it shall be scheduled for inspection and assigned a priority in accordance with the procedure for formal serious complaints, above.

d. Other Government Agency Referrals. Notifications of hazards observed and reported (referred) to MOSH by other Federal, State or local government agencies or their employees (e.g., DHMH, DOT, local building inspectors, fire marshals, etc.) are included in this category.

(1) Such notifications are referrals when nongovernment employees are exposed to the alleged hazards.

(2) Reports by State and local government employees, their supervisors, or their representatives of unsafe or unhealthful working conditions within their own workplaces and to which they are exposed shall, of course, continue to be handled as complaints.

e. Media Reports. Reports in the media of accidents involving serious injury or of potentially serious workplace hazards shall be considered as referrals. "Reports" shall be understood to include news items reported in the media as well as hazards reported directly to MOSH by media source. Thus newspaper or magazine articles, photographs or news items reported over radio or television are examples of media reports as well as calls to the Regional Offices by reporters.

4. Referral Inspections. Referral Inspections are unprogrammed inspections and, except for complaints received from Discrimination personnel, shall be forwarded to the MOSH Operations Office using the OSHA-90 form.

5. Procedures. Each referral shall be evaluated as thoroughly as possible in accordance with the guidelines for evaluating complaints, to determine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a safety or health hazard exists. If so, the hazard shall be classified as imminent danger, serious or other-than-serious. Referrals to be inspected shall be assigned a priority by the MOSH Supervisor receiving the referral according to the severity of the alleged hazard.

a. When the CO/IH observes an imminent danger situation, the MOSH Supervisor shall be contacted immediately, if practicable. Otherwise, an inspection shall be conducted without delay and the MOSH Supervisor informed as soon as possible after the inspection has been initiated. The MOSH Supervisor shall advise the Compliance Manager of all imminent danger cases as soon as practical.

b. If, after evaluation, the MOSH Supervisor determines that a CO/IH referral from a safety and health agency should be classified as other-than-serious, such a referral will be handled by letter in accordance with the procedures for nonformal complaints and returned to MOSH Operations.

c. Other government agency referrals of other-than-serious conditions shall normally be handled by letter according to the instructions for nonformal complaints.

d. For all referrals handled by letter, other than CO/IH referrals, the following procedures apply:

(1) A letter shall be sent to the employer whenever a name and address is given in the referral or is obtainable with reasonable effort. Letters similar to those used for complaints shall be used for referrals. The most appropriate letter shall be written in accordance with the particular circumstances of the referral.

(2) If no employer name or address is obtainable, the referring party shall be notified by telephone of this fact and shall be informed that MOSH can take no action without being supplied with such information.

(3) When a letter is sent to the employer, the procedures for responding to nonformal complaints are applicable, except that no tenth letter inspections shall be scheduled.

e. There can be extraordinary circumstances when the Assistant Commissioner/Authorized Representative may decide that a government agency referral identifies a hazard of such a potentially serious nature that it warrants being placed in the same inspection priority as media reports.

f. In the case of media reports, reasonable efforts to corroborate the information contained in the report shall be made whenever necessary. Specifically, the Compliance Manager, before scheduling an inspection, shall determine if the incident is related to an apparent serious violation of a standard. This may be done by carefully reviewing the facts as reported by the media or, when indicated by the particular circumstances, by contacting a third party such as the police, the ambulance service, or in rare cases, by calling the employer.

g. Media reports of other-than-serious hazards will not normally require an agency response.

h. Except for referrals as noted in Nonformal Discrimination Complaints, referrals will not normally result in an inspection unless they involve potentially serious hazards. Consequently, referrals scheduled for inspection shall be investigated within 3 working days from assignment date.

i. No letter of acknowledgement or follow-up communications with the referring source will be necessary for referrals.

j. The scope of referral inspections shall be decided in accordance with the guidelines for complaints.

k. A case file shall be set up for each referral as it is received. This case file shall contain a copy of the completed OSHA-90 form, all documentation supporting the evaluation and classification of the referral and subsequent action documents. If an inspection is eventually performed, all of the material will be absorbed into the inspection case file.

 
Return to top of page